On 2024-06-26 18:06, Philip McGrath wrote:
> On 6/26/24 07:41, Andrew Tropin wrote:>
That said, the evaluator does attach so-called "meta-data" information
to procedures, such as the procedure name.
https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/Procedure-Properties.html.
On 2024-06-26 18:04, Andy Wingo wrote:
> On Wed 26 Jun 2024 11:36, Maxime Devos writes:
>
>> IIRC, the question wasn’t about debugging in general, it was about
>> source locations in particular. Surely program-sources (or, in this
>> case, procedure-source maybe?) (why are the procedures in this
On 2024-06-26 13:46, Maxime Devos wrote:
>>> >-Returns the number of characters in the given @var{string}.
>>> +Returns the number of bytes in the given @var{string}.
>>>
>>> This is false. For example, (string-length "😀") is 1, whereas in all
>>> encodings I know of it is >more than one byte.
On 2024-06-26 14:26, Maxime Devos wrote:
>>No; he wrote é, U+0065 LATIN SMALL LETTER E + U+0301 COMBINING ACUTE ACCENT,
>>which is two characters unlike é, LATIN SMALL LETTER E WITH ACUTE.
>>
>>Likewise 👨🏭 is U+1F468 MAN + U+200D ZERO WIDTH JOINER + U+1F3ED FACTORY.
>
> Right, I should have test
* libguile/list.c: (delq1): Create.
(delv1): Create.
(delete1): Create.
* doc/ref/api-data.texi (List Modification): Document it.
---
Hi Guile,
There was some discussion on IRC a while back about how it was odd
there were destructive delete1! and similar functions, but no
nondestructive variants.
Hi Richard and all other Guilers, too,
What follows is not code review, but your patch felt like an
opportunity to provide some commentary about the trajectory of Guile
development that I've wanted to share for awhile.
First, I think Guile's default environment is a total mess. It's the
very def
