Op 20-11-2023 om 17:16 schreef Timothy Sample:
Hi,
Maxime Devos writes:
Op 19-11-2023 om 18:17 schreef Karl Berry:
Hello Guile folk - back in May 2016, Mathieu Lirzin submitted a patch
to add a test driver for Guile Scheme to Automake.
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake-patches/2
Thanks for the replies.
MD> but I don't think it should be in Automake, because then the test
driver is harder to update
Fine by me :).
MD> I don't have any advise on how to get the automake maintainers
Sorry, I should have made it clear that I am, effectively, the automake
maintain
Op 21-11-2023 om 18:33 schreef Maxime Devos:
I think that doing nothing other than closing that patch would be a
reasonable course of action. :)
And how is "doing nothing" supposed to help with discoverability, ease
of updating the test driver, clarity, unbundling and the goals of Freja
No
Hello,
[Dropping Karl since we are no longer discussing Automake maintenance.]
Maxime Devos writes:
> [What about] discoverability, ease of updating the test driver,
> clarity, unbundling and the goals of Freja Nordsiek?
Maybe Guile should adopt the script as ‘guild test-am’ or somesuch.
Mathi
Op 18-11-2023 om 05:42 schreef Maxim Cournoyer:
* SRFI-61:: A more general `cond' clause
* SRFI-62:: S-expression comments.
-* SRFI-64:: A Scheme API for test suites.
+* SRFI 64:: A Scheme API for test suites.
Op 22-11-2023 om 00:02 schreef Timothy Sample:
Hello,
[Dropping Karl since we are no longer discussing Automake maintenance.]
Maxime Devos writes:
[What about] discoverability, ease of updating the test driver,
clarity, unbundling and the goals of Freja Nordsiek?
Maybe Guile should adopt
