I have read that in R7RS a library name is defined as:
-> ( + )
-> |
->
->
-> 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9
That means that a valid library name would be something like (a b 1),
where "1" is a valid library name part, but the following code
disagrees. running
On 13.11.2023 15:21, 無無 wrote:
> I have read that in R7RS a library name is defined as:
>
> -> ( + )
> -> |
> ->
> ->
> -> 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9
>
> That means that a valid library name would be something like (a b 1),
> where "1" is a valid library na
