Hi Vivien,
> This pushes the limits of my understanding of URIs, as I did not know
> we had to consider '%2E%2E' the same as '..'. However, the RFC is not
> very clear:
I wasn't able to find anything that MANDATED any normalization at all, either
before or after Relative Resolution. It is poss
Le vendredi 03 novembre 2023 à 13:49 -0400, Nathan a écrit :
> > This pushes the limits of my understanding of URIs, as I did not
> > know
> > we had to consider '%2E%2E' the same as '..'. However, the RFC is
> > not
> > very clear:
>
> I wasn't able to find anything that MANDATED any normalizatio
>From upstream commit 62504e3b5b01615297cf65c33ca76a474bd61dd3.
* module/srfi/srfi-128.scm
* module/srfi/srfi-128/128.body1.scm
* module/srfi/srfi-128/128.body2.scm
* test-suite/tests/srfi-128-test.scm
* test-suite/tests/srfi-128.test: New files.
* am/bootstrap.am (SOURCES): Register srfi-128.scm.
This is not original work: it merely integrates and formats the work of
Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer into Guile, with a few adjustments to avoid
warnings/fix missing imports. Thank you!
* module/srfi/srfi-126.scm: New file.
* test-suite/tests/srfi-126.test: New file.
* test-suite/tests/srfi-126-t