Hi,
Ramin Honary writes:
> Hello Guile developers:
>
> I have come to realize that there are several finalized SRFIs
> published by John Cowan and others, for example, SRFI-133 (vector
> library), SRFI-125 (intermediate hash tables), SRFI-126 (R6RS-based
> hash tables) that were intended to repl
Hi,
Bruno Victal writes:
> Hi,
>
> Would a rewrite of the Guile tests using SRFI-64 be a welcome idea?
> IMO the advantages of doing so are:
>
> * Less “specifics” that need to be learned solely for working with
> Guile. It's easier for people already using SRFI-64 to “bring in” their
> experien
