Re. issues with the standard SRFI 64 implementation, let me point out
that I've written an alternative implementation with cleaner code and
behavior of the default test runner; it's part of this (currently
dormant) project:
https://github.com/TaylanUB/scheme-srfis
(I've not yet had time to migrat
Hi Mike,
On 2023-09-23 16:13, Mike Gran wrote:
> And personally, I find that errors in srfi-64 tests are more difficult to
> interpret
> that errors in the guile test suite framework. The logging is worse.
If I'm not mistaken the logging behavior can be customized by writing
your own SRFI-64 tes
