Hi Colin,
Colin Woodbury skribis:
> Hi again, any thoughts on these SRFI-171 extensions?
Looong ago, before we waited for copyright assignment to be on file, I
made minor suggestions on the patch, which I think you haven’t responded
to:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2023-01/
On 8/18/23 19:03, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Apologies for the delays, we’re pioneering “slow dev” I guess. :-)
Haha no issue at all!
> Could you take a look?
In that case, please hold on the patch. I am currently "rounding out"
the "one true Transducer API" in several other Lisps, and am close
Hello Arne,
"Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" skribis:
> I did the changes for the review. It took a while (sorry for that) but
> it got cleaner as a result (thank you!)
>
> Firstoff: I’d like to assign my copyright to the FSF. I’ll sign the
> papers once I receive them. Also I have an Employer discla
Hello,
Colin Woodbury skribis:
> In that case, please hold on the patch. I am currently "rounding out"
> the "one true Transducer API" in several other Lisps, and am close to
> what I consider a representative set of the desirable primitives a
> developer would want out-of-the-box. One I'm done
Hello Ludo,
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> OK. I assumed you already emailed ass...@gnu.org the relevant form,
> right? Let us know how it goes.
If I read it right, the docs
https://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/html_node/Copyright-Papers.html
say that I need to ask someone to get the papers I can the
"Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" writes:
> I’m attaching the new squashed patch again here and will add the patches
> for the review changes to a second email.
Attached are the promised patches of the additional review changes.
Thank you for your review!
From 3d9b452137911e1948586657edb1ea614d8a70c
