Maxime Devos skribis:
> ;; Before:
> ;; unknown file:#f:#f: syntax-stuff-twice: bad in subform
> # follow"> of # very hard to follow">
> ;; After:
> ;; [the same thing]
> ;;
> ;; Looks like another patch is needed ...
What backtrace are you trying to get?
Getting a backtrace showi
Hello!
Jan Nieuwenhuizen skribis:
> It seems that only re-exporting a (non-macro) variable from an otherwise
> un used module gives a false positive `unused module' warning; it
> doesn't even say `possibly unused module'. Not a big problem, but can
> anything be done about that?
I fixed that a
Hello!
Maxime Devos skribis:
> Why should Wisp be a separate package when other SRFIs are made part
> of Guile? Your point about maintenance and evolving applies equally
> to other SRFIs.
That’s a good point. Making it available as (srfi srfi-119) would make
sense I guess. I need to take a c
Hi,
Ludovic Courtès writes:
>> Why should Wisp be a separate package when other SRFIs are made part
>> of Guile? Your point about maintenance and evolving applies equally
>> to other SRFIs.
>
> That’s a good point. Making it available as (srfi srfi-119) would make
> sense I guess. I need to t
On 24-02-2023 16:48, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Maxime Devos skribis:
;; Before:
;; unknown file:#f:#f: syntax-stuff-twice: bad in subform
# of #
;; After:
;; [the same thing]
;;
;; Looks like another patch is needed ...
What backtrace are you trying to get?
Getting a backtrace showing
On 24-02-2023 16:45, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Adding #lang support in Guile would be nice. As discussed on IRC, it
can be experimented with in a WIP branch.
Have you seen my messages on how the "#lang" construct is problematic
for some languages, and how alternatives like "[comment delimiter] -
On 25-02-2023 00:48, Maxime Devos wrote:
(**) For compatibility with Racket, it's not like we couldn't
implement both "#lang" and "-*- stuff: language -*-".
TBC, I mean ‘only support #lang' for values of 'lang' that Racket
supports’, or alternatively ‘support #lang for compatibility, but
re
On 2/24/23 3:51 PM, Maxime Devos wrote:
On 25-02-2023 00:48, Maxime Devos wrote:
(**) For compatibility with Racket, it's not like we couldn't
implement both "#lang" and "-*- stuff: language -*-".
TBC, I mean ‘only support #lang' for values of 'lang' that Racket
supports’, or alternatively ‘s
