Re: GNU Guile 3.0.9rc1 available for testing!

Hi Jan, Jan Nieuwenhuizen skribis: > Yeah, you need at least > > 76950b428 Support for x86_64-w64-mingw32. > > or something similar, or another approach for addressing the > SIZEOF_LONG==4 issue on MinGW. Oh sorry, I had completely overlooked that patch (and branch). I’m hesitant about app

Re: GNU Guile 3.0.9rc1 available for testing!

Hi, Greg Troxel skribis: > lloda writes: > >> This looks like https://debbugs.gnu.org/60971 >> on mac os. > > Yes, it does. > > My quick reaction is that if the POSIX-required macros operation on > system types that might be struct, then faking up ints for testi

Re: GNU Guile 3.0.9rc1 available for testing!

Hola! Aleix Conchillo Flaqué skribis: > Not because I worked on it :-), but missing JIT support on Apple Silicon > chips in the NEWS, which makes Guile *fast* on that hardware. > > https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=44505 Oops, my bad; added to NEWS! You confirm that building from t

Re: GNU Guile 3.0.9rc1 available for testing!

Hi, Greg Troxel skribis: > and, in guile-readline/Makefile.am I see > > if HAVE_READLINE > > SOURCES += ice-9/readline.scm > > and I don't see an else with EXTRA_DIST. I think it's a bug for make > dist contents to vary with whether or not libs are available on the > local system. Oops, go

Re: GNU Guile 3.0.9rc1 available for testing!

Greg Troxel skribis: > My second approach is using the rc tarball in pkgsrc. I had to patch > out the verify call. pkgsrc already works around PaX issues mostly, via > paxctl on things that do jit, after build and before use, and by > > --- libguile/loader.c.orig 2018-01-08 16:21:04.7908

Re: GNU Guile 3.0.9rc1 available for testing!

Ludovic Courtès writes: Hi Ludo, > Jan Nieuwenhuizen skribis: > >> Yeah, you need at least >> >> 76950b428 Support for x86_64-w64-mingw32. >> >> or something similar, or another approach for addressing the >> SIZEOF_LONG==4 issue on MinGW. > > Oh sorry, I had completely overlooked that patch

Re: GNU Guile 3.0.9rc1 available for testing!

On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 2:45 AM Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hola! > > Hola! > Aleix Conchillo Flaqué skribis: > > > Not because I worked on it :-), but missing JIT support on Apple Silicon > > chips in the NEWS, which makes Guile *fast* on that hardware. > > > > https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugrepo

Re: GNU Guile 3.0.9rc1 available for testing!

lgtm, no other issues on mac os. thanks Daniel

Re: GNU Guile 3.0.9rc1 available for testing!

On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 2:48 AM Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hi, > > Greg Troxel skribis: > > > lloda writes: > > > >> This looks like https://debbugs.gnu.org/60971 < > https://debbugs.gnu.org/60971> on mac os. > > > > Yes, it does. > > > > My quick reaction is that if the POSIX-required macros ope

Re: bug#60971: build failure of v3.0.9rc1 on mac os 12.6

lloda skribis: > lgtm, no other issues on mac os. Awesome, pushed as 9b20ca275dba758a194073936cde7c95311bd51e. Ludo’.

Re: Add internal definitions to derived forms

Hi Daniel, Chiming in late in the discussion… lloda skribis: > From 7aea299373f7370f31c9701035260ad412763724 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Daniel Llorens > Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2023 16:23:29 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Fix documentation for forms taking lambda-like bodies > > * doc/ref/api-co

Re: [PATCHv3] Extensions for SRFI-171 (Transducers)

Hi Colin, Colin Woodbury skribis: > Hi Ludovic, thanks for getting back to me! I've updated the patches as > you've suggested. I think I've gotten the commit format correct this > time. Yup, it’s looks perfect! > Also, I'll opt to assign copyright to the FSF, as I've already done so > for Emac

Re: Add internal definitions to derived forms

Hi Ludovic, > On 23 Jan 2023, at 23:13, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > Chiming in late in the discussion… > > lloda skribis: > >> From 7aea299373f7370f31c9701035260ad412763724 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Daniel Llorens >> Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2023 16:23:29 +0100 >> Subject:

Re: [PATCHv3] Extensions for SRFI-171 (Transducers)

Hi Ludovic, Sorry if I wasn't clear - I have alright assigned copyright to the FSF (about 1.5 years ago). Things should be good to go, unless I've misunderstood. Cheers, Colin On 1/24/23 07:17, Ludovic Courtès wrote: Hi Colin, Colin Woodbury skribis: Hi Ludovic, thanks for getting back

Re: Add internal definitions to derived forms

Hi! Sorry about the delay, I have an updated patch somewhere, but I started working after 4 months paternity leave and family life's fortunes has it so that I haven't used a computer since the last time I wrote an email in this thread (this is written on a phone). This is likely how will be in