Hi,
> > (define foo 'bar) ;; <--- ^^^
> > (define-syntax foobar
> > (syntax-rules (foo)
> > ((_ foo)
> > (begin (pk "it's a foo!") foo))
> > ((_ goo)
> > (begin (pk "it's not a foo ...") goo
> >
> > (define (zebra stripes)
> > (if stripes
> > (define foo 'quux)) ;;
Hmm this was wrong, I mean
For conditional variables we have a default begin. So then why on earth do
you not have an implicit let?, Just laziness?
There should be a good reason or? this is a pretty fundamental change that
I support but then we should not be lazy not trying to understand the
desi
Stefan Israelsson Tampe schreef op za 05-02-2022 om 18:31 [+0100]:
> Hmm this was wrong, I mean
>
> For conditional variables we have a default begin. So then why on
> earth do you not have an implicit let?, Just laziness?
Do you mean Guile in general, or the particular example I gave?
Also, I do
Hello! I'm giving a talk tomorrow (or maybe "today" already in the
target timezone) on Spritely Goblins on Guile. You can follow along by
checking out the repo here:
https://gitlab.com/spritely/guile-goblins
I plan on getting out a release which will be installable by Guix proper
Real Soon No
On Sat, 5 Feb 2022, at 18:31, Stefan Israelsson Tampe wrote:
> Hmm this was wrong, I mean
>
> For conditional variables we have a default begin. So then why on earth
> do you not have an implicit let?, Just laziness?
> There should be a good reason or? this is a pretty fundamental change
> tha
