Note that 121 is withdrawn, so people should implement 158.
On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 1:38 AM Mark H Weaver wrote:
> Hi Arthur,
>
> "Arthur A. Gleckler" writes:
> > It's not a bad idea for the sample implementation to be as clear as
> > possible at the expense of performance.
>
> I agree that it'
Hi Y'all!
I have an efficient, almost done implementation of srfi-121. I believe it lacks
generator-unfold, but that is all. make-coroutine-generator is implemented
using delimited continuations and runs a lot faster than the one in the
reference implementation, with the caveat that it is appar
Sorry, I though this was in the guile mailing list.
--
Linus Björnstam
On Tue, 26 Jan 2021, at 07:48, Linus Björnstam wrote:
> Hi Y'all!
>
> I have an efficient, almost done implementation of srfi-121. I believe
> it lacks generator-unfold, but that is all. make-coroutine-generator is
> imp
Am Di., 26. Jan. 2021 um 08:08 Uhr schrieb Linus Björnstam <
linus.bjorns...@veryfast.biz>:
> Hi Y'all!
>
> I have an efficient, almost done implementation of srfi-121. I believe it
> lacks generator-unfold, but that is all. make-coroutine-generator is
> implemented using delimited continuations a
