guile-devel@gnu.org

On Mon 25 Nov 2019 17:45, Ludovic Courtès writes: > This ensures core binding '&error' is silently replaced by the SRFI-35 > variant. Again LGTM but it would be nicest to really re-export the binding instead of making a new definition :) Andy

Re: [PATCH 1/2] srfi-34: Replace the 'raise' core binding.

On Mon 25 Nov 2019 17:45, Ludovic Courtès writes: > In Guile 2.x, (srfi srfi-34) would already replace 'raise'. Replacing > avoids a run-time warning about the core binding being overridden. > > * module/srfi/srfi-34.scm (raise): New variable. > Mark it as #:replace instead of #:re-export. > ---

Re: For a cheaper ‘bytevector->pointer’

Hi :) On Mon 25 Nov 2019 23:03, Ludovic Courtès writes: > Andy Wingo skribis: > >> Honestly I would prefer not to do this. If I understand correctly, the >> problem is in FFI calls -- you have a bytevector and you want to pass it >> as a pointer. In that case the "right" optimization is to av

Re: [PATCH 1/2] srfi-34: Replace the 'raise' core binding.

Andy Wingo skribis: > On Mon 25 Nov 2019 17:45, Ludovic Courtès writes: > >> In Guile 2.x, (srfi srfi-34) would already replace 'raise'. Replacing >> avoids a run-time warning about the core binding being overridden. >> >> * module/srfi/srfi-34.scm (raise): New variable. >> Mark it as #:replace