Hi Jan,
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
> Mark H Weaver writes:
>
>> Andy Wingo writes:
>>> Before the RMS/GNU/FSF conversation started, Mark Weaver left Guile, for
>>> essentially unrelated reasons. He threatened to leave because he wished
>>> to be consulted before I landed mixed definitions and e
For what it's worth:
Then I of course retract what I said about RMS not showing good leadership
by not consulting with Andy and Ludovic. I still support the initiative to
find a new governing structure for GNU. Note also that both the GNU
maintainers statement and RMS himself talk about new govern
Hi Mikhail,
Mikhail Kryshen writes:
> Andy,
>
> If you've long had issues with RMS, then why do you still want to be
> with GNU? You don't have to participate in GNU to be part of the free
> software movement. Is it that you see GNU as an important platform for
> your political activism? Is i
Hello,
pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) writes:
> This is very sad. I appreciate the enormous time investments of all
> of you for Guile. When you make a decision, I hope you understand the
> other.
>
> Regards,
> Florian
Many incredibly thoughtful emails have been sent to the mailing list on
this
> Sent: Friday, October 18, 2019 at 5:17 AM
> From: "Richard Stallman"
[...]
> Please don't ask for a fork in Guix. Forking is not a desirable
> outcome.
Would you agree to abolish the Chief GNUisance role in favor of their proposal
of having "GNU maintainers to collectively decide about the
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
> Mark H Weaver writes:
>
>> Andy Wingo writes:
>>> Before the RMS/GNU/FSF conversation started, Mark Weaver left Guile, for
>>> essentially unrelated reasons. He threatened to leave because he wished
>>> to be consulted before I landed mixed definitions and expressions
Hi Christopher,
Christopher Lemmer Webber wrote:
> I think *RMS's* action of unilaterally re-appointing Mark without
> notifying or asking the other maintainers
Did you not see my recent correction about this? I CC'd you,
but maybe something went wrong. Please see:
https://lists.gnu.org/arc
[resending with fixed headers, for proper threading]
Hi Christopher,
Christopher Lemmer Webber wrote:
> I think *RMS's* action of unilaterally re-appointing Mark without
> notifying or asking the other maintainers
Did you not see my recent correction about this? I CC'd you,
but maybe something
Mark H Weaver writes:
> [resending with fixed headers, for proper threading]
>
> Hi Christopher,
>
> Christopher Lemmer Webber wrote:
>> I think *RMS's* action of unilaterally re-appointing Mark without
>> notifying or asking the other maintainers
>
> Did you not see my recent correction about th
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 9:33 AM Christopher Lemmer Webber
wrote:
>
> Mark H Weaver writes:
>
> > [resending with fixed headers, for proper threading]
> >
> > Hi Christopher,
> >
> > Christopher Lemmer Webber wrote:
> >> I think *RMS's* action of unilaterally re-appointing Mark without
> >> notify
Hi Mark,
Mark H Weaver skribis:
> RMS has not yet appointed me as a co-maintainer. To my knowledge, the
> only thing he has done so far is to *ask* me if I wanted to be appointed
> co-maintainer. I answered "yes", but I've not yet received any further
> messages from him on this topic. I also
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 11:29:35AM +, Todor Kondić wrote:
> You know, there is a big IT department within our institution and telling
> them I will base some serious work on technologies such as GNU Guile and
> Guix did raise a few eyebrows (those not raised are probably the cause of
> thei
Alex Sassmannshausen writes:
> Hi Mikhail,
>
> Mikhail Kryshen writes:
>
>> Andy,
>>
>> If you've long had issues with RMS, then why do you still want to be
>> with GNU? You don't have to participate in GNU to be part of the free
>> software movement. Is it that you see GNU as an important pla
13 matches
Mail list logo
