Hi!
Currently i try to compile guile-2.2.4 under mingw64 bit. I had some
minor issues in the c source code which i managed to fix by applying
some of the patches from https://github.com/mkeeter/guile-mingw. Namely
1) 0003-winsock-compat.mingw.patch
2) 0004-start_child.mingw.patch
Now i am at th
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 03:31:25PM +0100, Christoph Buck wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Currently i try to compile guile-2.2.4 under mingw64 bit. I had some
> minor issues in the c source code which i managed to fix by applying
> some of the patches from https://github.com/mkeeter/guile-mingw. Namely
[...]
>
> From: Christoph Buck
> Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 15:31:25 +0100
>
> > ice-9/boot-9.scm:752:25: In procedure dispatch-exception:
> > In procedure bytevector-u64-set!: Value out of range: -149659645
> > make[2]: *** [Makefile:1931: ice-9/eval.go] Error 1
> > make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/Christo
Mike Gran writes:
> Hey Chris,
>
> This is one of two errors. One problem is that Guile makes assumptions
> about the size of long vs the size of a pointer, as do some the
> libraries on which Guile depends. In practice, your Guile needs to be
> compiled under MinGW 32-bit where sizeof(void *)
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 06:16:32PM +0100, Christoph Buck wrote:
> Mike Gran writes:
>
> > Hey Chris,
> >
> > This is one of two errors. One problem is that Guile makes assumptions
> > about the size of long vs the size of a pointer, as do some the
> > libraries on which Guile depends. In practi
Christoph Buck writes:
> Currently i try to compile guile-2.2.4 under mingw64 bit.
Oh, interesting!
> I had some minor issues in the c source code which i managed to fix by
> applying some of the patches from
> https://github.com/mkeeter/guile-mingw. Namely
>
> 1) 0003-winsock-compat.mingw.patch
Mike Gran writes:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 06:16:32PM +0100, Christoph Buck wrote:
>> Is there currently no way to get guile running under mingw-64bit? My plan
>> was to integrate guile in a project of mine which currently only builds
>> under 64bit.
>
> Well anything is possible, of course. Her
Hi Marc,
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen writes:
> > Let's run the following example:
> >
> > (eval-when (expand)
> > (define-syntax bar
> > (syntax-rules ()
> > ((_ stx)
> >(syntax-case stx ()
> > ((_ a (... ...))
> > #'#t)
> > ((_ a b c)
> >
