Hello,
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:
> Total time: 66.515425859 seconds (31.859444991 seconds in GC)
So, more investigation on the GC side…
‘perf’ shows a profile like this:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
12.33% guilelibgc.so.1.0.3
Hi Nala,
Nala Ginrut writes:
> Personally, I'd like to see many languages on Guile. But I prefer maintain
> mine, guile-lua-rebirth and a new shell language(undone) as an external
> package.
> GNU official project reviews contributions too strictly, it's good for the
> quality and free software
Looks promising, especailly if the footprint is small.
Can someone post the sample guix specification?
I could not access from the gnunet log.
Matt Wette writes:
> Looks promising, especailly if the footprint is small.
> Can someone post the sample guix specification?
> I could not access from the gnunet log.
Do you mean the wisp package for Guix?
It’s here:
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/gnu/packages/guile.scm?id=v
> On Sep 17, 2017, at 4:22 PM, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
>
>
> Matt Wette writes:
>> Looks promising, especailly if the footprint is small.
>> Can someone post the sample guix specification?
>> I could not access from the gnunet log.
>
> Do you mean the wisp package for Guix?
No, I mean
Julian Graham writes:
> It looks like there was a subtle but significant regression introduced
> to the behavior of `bitwise-copy-bit' in `(rnrs arithmetic bitwise)'
> back in 93da406f33.
>
> R6RS says [0] that function (with arguments EI1, EI2, EI3) should
> transfer the EI2th bit from EI3 to EI
Mark H Weaver writes:
> Julian Graham writes:
>
>> It looks like there was a subtle but significant regression introduced
>> to the behavior of `bitwise-copy-bit' in `(rnrs arithmetic bitwise)'
>> back in 93da406f33.
>>
>> R6RS says [0] that function (with arguments EI1, EI2, EI3) should
>> tran
