Which git branch is best for continued Guile 1.8 development?
I know most people have no interest in 1.8, that's fine, just
kindly humor this slow janitor w/ a normative answer, thanks.
(I guess ‘branch_release-1-8’, but maybe someone knows better.)
--
Thien-Thi Nguyen -
On Sat 05 Nov 2016 23:01, Jean Louis writes:
> Sadly, the procedure-source is not working. This would be very useful
> for programming.
>
> Jean
>
> scheme@(guile-user) [50]> (define (dosomething text) (write text))
> scheme@(guile-user) [50]> (dosomething "Hello")
> "Hello"scheme@(guile-user) [5
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 03:09:06PM +0100, Andy Wingo wrote:
> On Sat 05 Nov 2016 23:01, Jean Louis writes:
>
> > Sadly, the procedure-source is not working. This would be very useful
> > for programming.
> >
> > Jean
> >
> > scheme@(guile-user) [50]> (define (dosomething text) (write text))
> > s
On Wed 01 Mar 2017 13:14, Thien-Thi Nguyen writes:
> Which git branch is best for continued Guile 1.8 development?
> I know most people have no interest in 1.8, that's fine, just
> kindly humor this slow janitor w/ a normative answer, thanks.
>
> (I guess ‘branch_release-1-8’, but maybe someone k
Heya Freja,
On Tue 21 Feb 2017 20:36, Freja Nordsiek writes:
> Patch for bug #24816: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=24816
Apologies for not noticing this patch; I was working from the debbugs
interface and didn't see this. In the future you can update a bug with
a patch by CC'in
Andy Wingo writes:
> On Fri 24 Feb 2017 18:46, Arne Babenhauserheide writes:
>
>> The main strategical question I see for that is: Does anything make it
>> harder to complete or improve the lilypond transition to Guile 2?
>>
>> Is there something which would need to be done before 2.2 which cou
Le 23/02/2016 à 17:57, Arne Babenhauserheide a écrit :
So, to summarize the things I can change:
- Add the path to the installed package in guild show or list-packages
- Add a dynamical site as repository
- Package guix features
- Package guildhall in guix
And things I can’t change easily:
-
Le 01/03/2017 à 20:35, Amirouche a écrit :
Le 23/02/2016 à 17:57, Arne Babenhauserheide a écrit :
That said I have an issue with registration/login
stuff anything related with setting cookies I don't find a good
abstraction,
for it.
I keep you posted.
So I found a solution that satisfy me.
Thanks for the tip on how to properly reply to a bugreport. I will make
sure I get that right next time.
By the way, I tested the method you used manually on 2.0.x today and it
fixed the discrepancy with R6RS there too. Might consider patching that
branch too. Hopefully no one has been depending o
On Wed 01 Mar 2017 22:15, Freja Nordsiek writes:
> By the way, I tested the method you used manually on 2.0.x today and
> it fixed the discrepancy with R6RS there too. Might consider patching
> that branch too. Hopefully no one has been depending on the
> non-truncating behavior.
Would you mind
Hi folks!
It's been a long time for me to be inactive here. ;-)
I saw there's thread to discuss Guile benchmark, I think it's better
to mention the JIT compiler of Guile. It exists and real, and of
course, very fast.
Thanks Atsuro Hoshino, who is the author of Guile JIT compiler. We've
met on IC
11 matches
Mail list logo
