Re: MinGW vs. setlocale

2014-06-21 Thread Eli Zaretskii
Ping! Can the changes below please be committed? Should I do that myself? TIA > Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2014 20:23:17 +0300 > From: Eli Zaretskii > CC: guile-devel@gnu.org > > Here are the changes I needed for i18n.c to get the tests to succeed. > They have to do with non-portable assumptions about

Re: MinGW vs. setlocale

2014-06-21 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi Eli, (Sorry for the delay, I switched contexts, and I’m not using fair scheduling I suppose. ;-)) Eli Zaretskii skribis: > Here are the changes I needed for i18n.c to get the tests to succeed. > They have to do with non-portable assumptions about when the various > nl_langinfo constants are

Re: MinGW vs. setlocale

2014-06-21 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) > Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2014 17:02:30 +0200 > > Hi Eli, > > (Sorry for the delay, I switched contexts, and I’m not using fair > scheduling I suppose. ;-)) No sweat. > > --- libguile/i18n.c~2 2014-06-15 14:21:53 +0300 > > +++ li

Re: MinGW vs. setlocale

2014-06-21 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Eli Zaretskii skribis: [...] >> This change looks OK to me. Can you commit it yourself? > > Yes. Just to be sure: I should commit it to the stable-2.0 branch, > right? Yes, please. It’ll be merged to master eventually. Thanks, Ludo’.

getrlimit and setrlimit interface

2014-06-21 Thread Ludovic Courtès
The ‘getrlimit’ and ‘setrlimit’ procedures are not documented in the manual. They’re supposed to be passed a symbol or a number: (getrlimit 'nofile) == (getrlimit 7) ≍ getrlimit (RLIMIT_NOFILE, &lim) For most other POSIX functions with a similar interface, we instead define Scheme variables wi