Re: include can't work

2013-11-18 Thread Mark H Weaver
Nala Ginrut writes: > On Sun, 2013-11-17 at 05:09 -0500, Mark H Weaver wrote: >> Guile's 'include' also supports relative paths if the (include "...") >> form is found within a file, or more generally, if it was read from a >> port that had its filename set. >> >> Please tell us more about what

Re: include can't work

2013-11-18 Thread Mark H Weaver
Mark H Weaver writes: > This should work if "a.scm" and "b.scm" are files in the same directory. > It works for me. I'm unable to reproduce the problem you're seeing. > Can you help me to reproduce it? How are you loading "a.scm"? It occurs to me that this might be caused by one of your Guile c

Re: [PATCH] Add procedures to convert alists into hash tables

2013-11-18 Thread Ludovic Courtès
David Thompson skribis: > From 03f604cc3dfffb816cfe66a355e36ede337749f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: David Thompson > Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 22:43:37 -0400 > Subject: [PATCH] Add procedures to convert alists into hash tables. > > * module/ice-9/hash-table.scm: New module. > > * test-suite/te

Re: [PATCH] Add procedures to convert alists into hash tables

2013-11-18 Thread David Thompson
On 11/18/2013 03:32 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > David Thompson skribis: > >> From 03f604cc3dfffb816cfe66a355e36ede337749f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: David Thompson >> Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 22:43:37 -0400 >> Subject: [PATCH] Add procedures to convert alists into hash tables. >> >> * mod

Re: include can't work

2013-11-18 Thread Nala Ginrut
On Mon, 2013-11-18 at 13:15 -0500, Mark H Weaver wrote: > Mark H Weaver writes: > > This should work if "a.scm" and "b.scm" are files in the same directory. > > It works for me. I'm unable to reproduce the problem you're seeing. > > Can you help me to reproduce it? How are you loading "a.scm"? >

Re: [PATCH] Add procedures to convert alists into hash tables

2013-11-18 Thread Mark H Weaver
David Thompson writes: > Fixed texi docs and docstrings. Pushed to stable-2.0. Many thanks! :) Mark

Re: [PATCH] Split r6rs-ports.c according to module boundaries

2013-11-18 Thread Mark H Weaver
Hi Andreas, This new patch has a very serious problem, which was not obvious at first glance. We've made some significant improvements to r6rs-ports.c since you first introduced this patch, and this new patch would effectively undo all of them. It's a good thing I took the time to check. Please