Hi,
On Sun 08 Sep 2013 20:19, Sjoerd van Leent writes:
> Reading the written thoughts below, what was the actual reason no to use
> GNU Lightning? Has that too many complexities or incompatibilities to be
> used for Scheme and other functional languages opposed to it's native
> GNU Smalltalk?
>
On Sat 14 Sep 2013 15:59, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> It looks like a useful tool to me.
FWIW I totally agree!
> I don’t like the name “mvar” (“monadic variable”, I guess). Perhaps
> “synchronized box”, or “transactional variable”, or...? The downside of
> choosing another name is
On Sat 14 Sep 2013 15:48, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Andy Wingo skribis:
>
>> - Add machinery to (system vm debug) to get a DIE for a procedure, if
>> it is present.
>
> It would be great if it would support .gnu_debuglink too (info "(gdb)
> Separate Debug Files").
The guile-