Thien-Thi Nguyen skribis:
> Anyway, i hope Guile grows a ‘sendfile-some’ (or whatever) so that i can
> adapt my programs to use it instead of the ttn-do ‘sendfile’:
I’m open to the idea. To get a better understanding, do you have
examples of real applications where it makes a difference? I.e.,
() l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
() Wed, 17 Apr 2013 14:52:40 +0200
concrete cases of recurring short writes?
The original application was "ttn-do serve-debiso", which configures
"ttn-do sizzweb" to serve debian ISOs (or rather, the various component
.deb files and metadata that apt-get reque
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 10:00:55PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> Unfortunately, this is rarely possible in a language like Scheme, where
> calls to procedures bound by mutable top-level variables are frequent.
> We cannot fix this without making most commonly-used top-level bindings
> immutable. L
Thien-Thi Nguyen skribis:
> The original application was "ttn-do serve-debiso", which configures
> "ttn-do sizzweb" to serve debian ISOs (or rather, the various component
> .deb files and metadata that apt-get requests from the loopback-mounted
> ISO) over the home network.
>
> Specifically, proc
Hi Chris,
"Chris K. Jester-Young" writes:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 10:00:55PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
>> Unfortunately, this is rarely possible in a language like Scheme, where
>> calls to procedures bound by mutable top-level variables are frequent.
>> We cannot fix this without making mos
"Chris K. Jester-Young" writes:
> With a proper module system, I don't see why top-level bindings should
> be mutable. That would make even things like direct inlining of cons or
> + somewhat harder than it needs to be. The way I understand it, the
> definition of (@ (guile) cons) or the like sho
Ian Price writes:
> The current issues with lua vs master are as follows
> 1) has been renamed to on master
> 2) has been replaced with which is not quite a drop-in
> 3) while was being compiled into something with improper scoping.
>
> I have fixes for these locally. There is just the questi
() l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
() Wed, 17 Apr 2013 18:27:04 +0200
So that was over a PF_INET/SOCK_STREAM socket, right?
Yes. FWIW, "ttn-do sizzweb" can also operate over PF_UNIX/SOCK_STREAM
and i recall doing some testing (w/ similar results) there.
Would it occur systematically, or ju
