Hi all,
In order to support efficient compilation of generators and
accumulators I think that we
need to add/change the current rtl format with.
1. named gotos
2. Add the possibility that in a call be able to name a stack object.
Rationale:
1) If a generator is inlined in a function we must be a
() Mark H Weaver
() Wed, 10 Apr 2013 07:26:32 -0400
Regarding the proposed low-level interface (which I will call
'sendfile-some' for now), I have a question: can it actually be used
to write a robust asynchronous server?
I can't imagine why not, although i certainly don't pretend to be
() l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
() Wed, 10 Apr 2013 22:56:38 +0200
Well, I sympathize with the idea of sticking to the underlying
syscall semantics; yet, for my own uses of ‘sendfile’, I can only
think of cases all I want is to send the file.
I understand; it's easy to project one's li
Hi all, I wanted to describe what my nearest effort in the guile-log
world will be targeted at.
First a small discussion of guile-log.
Guile-log is a macro system that originally was developed in order to
have a more schemish
macro system to model prolog program in. Kanren does not work here
beca
