Hi Andy,
Andy Wingo writes:
> On Wed 03 Apr 2013 22:33, Mark H Weaver writes:
>
>> + /* If we just read a BOM in an encoding that recognizes them,
>> + then silently consume it and read another code point. */
>> + if (SCM_UNLIKELY (*codepoint == SCM_UNICODE_BOM
>>
>>> + /* If the specified encoding is UTF-16 or UTF-32, then make
>>> + that more precise by deciding what endianness to use. */
>>> + if (strcasecmp (pt->encoding, "UTF-16") == 0)
>>> + precise_encoding = decide_utf16_encoding (port, mode);
>>> + else if (strcas
Mike Gran skribis:
+ /* If the specified encoding is UTF-16 or UTF-32, then make
+ that more precise by deciding what endianness to use. */
+ if (strcasecmp (pt->encoding, "UTF-16") == 0)
+ precise_encoding = decide_utf16_encoding (port, mode);
>>
Hi Mark,
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 02:48:29AM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> Thanks for working on this, but in the future, please post your proposed
> patches for review before pushing to stable-2.0 or master.
You're right, that was a lapse of judgement on my part. Sorry.
> > -(define %stream-null
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 08:36:51AM -0400, Chris K. Jester-Young wrote:
> > The clarity of this code could greatly benefit from some helper
> > procedures. One possibility would be a procedure that takes a promise
> > and two continuation arguments: one to call if the promise has already
> > been c
Daniel Llorens skribis:
> +(with-test-prefix "array-copy!"
> +
> + (with-test-prefix "rank 2"
> +(pass-if (let ((a #2((1 2) (3 4)))
> + (b (make-array 0 2 2))
Can you make that:
(with-test-prefix "array-copy!"
(pass-if "rank 2"
(let ((a ...
(Same for the
On Apr 5, 2013, at 19:20, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Daniel Llorens skribis:
>
>> +(with-test-prefix "array-copy!"
>> +
>> + (with-test-prefix "rank 2"
>> +(pass-if (let ((a #2((1 2) (3 4)))
>> + (b (make-array 0 2 2))
>
> Can you make that:
>
> (with-test-prefix "array-
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Mike Gran skribis:
>
>> It would be a trivial function to write, of course, but there is a
>> c-strcasecmp func in gnulib.
>
> Yes, better use that one.
>
> (Just add ‘c-strcase’ in m4/gnulib-cache.m4, run ‘gnulib-tool --update’
> with Gnulib v0.0-7865-ga8
Daniel Llorens skribis:
> Like this?
Yes, thanks.
Ludo'.
Daniel Llorens skribis:
> From 76432b25fda11957142e94653aafbc798ef4d880 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Daniel Llorens
> Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 22:40:40 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH 2/3] Remove double indirection in array-fill!
>
> * libguile/array-map.c: new function rafill, like scm_array_fill_int,
Nala Ginrut skribis:
> Add call/ec and let/ec to (ice-9 control) with docs in the manual.
I ended up making many changes (some suggested by Mark on IRC), and the
result is commit 55e26a4.
Please note the differences. It would be beneficial if your future
submissions could be closer to our expe
Nala Ginrut writes:
> +@deffn {Scheme Procedure} call/ec proc
> +'ec' stands for escape-continuation, or so-called 'one-shot' continuation.
> +@var{call/ec} is equivalent to call-with-escape-continuation.
> +A continuation obtained from call/ec is actually a kind of prompt.
> @var{call/ec}
> +i
Okay, apparently Ludovic already mailed the list about this, but I
didn't see it due to a stale gnus.
Ah well. Such is life.
--
Ian Price -- shift-reset.com
"Programming is like pinball. The reward for doing it well is
the opportunity to do it again" - from "The Wizardy Compiled"
Attached is a patch to remove the duplicated definitions.
--
Ian Price -- shift-reset.com
"Programming is like pinball. The reward for doing it well is
the opportunity to do it again" - from "The Wizardy Compiled"
>From ffbe4cf3c151d5d5affd5baecf7b4cf65b22ce50 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ia
在 2013-4-6 AM8:53，"Ian Price" 写道：
>
> Nala Ginrut writes:
>
> > +@deffn {Scheme Procedure} call/ec proc
> > +'ec' stands for escape-continuation, or so-called 'one-shot'
continuation.
> > +@var{call/ec} is equivalent to call-with-escape-continuation.
> > +A continuation obtained from call/ec is ac
On Fri, 2013-04-05 at 08:22 +0800, Daniel Hartwig wrote:
> On 4 April 2013 12:39, Nala Ginrut wrote:
> > I don't think it's necessary to add the docs since it's explicit.
> > It may help for some guys like me. ;-)
>
> Every part of the API must be documented. How else do guys like you
> know thi
Hello all,
I discovered that 'scm_unget_byte' is kind of dumb. It puts the bytes
at the beginning of the pushback buffer instead of the end. This means
that every time you unget a byte, it has to shift up the existing
contents of the buffer, so ungetting N bytes takes O(N^2) time.
This patch im
17 matches
Mail list logo
