Re: What's the plan of Guile on GSoC 2013?

2013-03-08 Thread Nala Ginrut
On Thu, 2013-03-07 at 11:57 -0500, Noah Lavine wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > > So, ideas? :-) > > > > How about continuing the Emacs-Guile integration? I would be really excited > to finally see that happen. > Well, there're bad/good news for yo

Re: My Guile 2.0.8 TODO list

2013-03-08 Thread Daniel Hartwig
On 6 March 2013 05:14, Mark H Weaver wrote: > * [Daniel Hartwig?] Support Relative URIs in (web uri) Although I have been unexpectedly busy this week, I will certainly be able to complete this task shortly. Regards

Re: CPS Update

2013-03-08 Thread Noah Lavine
Hello, Another quick update on CPS. I just pushed patches that implement closure conversion and use it to compile closures correctly. I think this is a big step forward for the CPS compiler. Since the last email, I've also implemented local mutable variables, and sequences (as part of that). Some

array operations

2013-03-08 Thread Daniel Llorens
On Mar 4, 2013, at 03:27, Noah Lavine wrote: > (I'm snipping the rest of your message because it needs more thought than I > can give it right now.) That message contained a number of errors, the consequence of talking before walking, I suppose. I have added a simple reduction operator to the

Re: bug#10522: Patch: Improve optional variable and keyword notation in manual

2013-03-08 Thread Daniel Hartwig
On 3 March 2013 17:45, Andy Wingo wrote: > On Sun 03 Mar 2013 02:07, Daniel Hartwig writes: > >> Can I ask whether it is preferred to use, e.g. @code{#f}, for the >> default values, as some places seem to and others don't. This patch >> is not using @code, but then, neither does it touch any doc

Re: bug#10522: Patch: Improve optional variable and keyword notation in manual

2013-03-08 Thread Daniel Hartwig
On 9 March 2013 09:58, Daniel Hartwig wrote: > On 3 March 2013 17:45, Andy Wingo wrote: >> On Sun 03 Mar 2013 02:07, Daniel Hartwig writes: >> >>> Can I ask whether it is preferred to use, e.g. @code{#f}, for the >>> default values, as some places seem to and others don't. This patch >>> is not