Mark H Weaver skribis:
> It seems to me that the dynamic FFI performs, at run time, the same jobs
> that a C compiler performs at compile time. If at some point we add
> support for accessing preprocessor macros and type definitions (which
> seems important), then we'll need the header files as
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Mark H Weaver skribis:
>
>> At some point, it might make sense to create a more static FFI that
>> works more like a C compiler does, splitting the job into compile-time
>> and run-time phases. This static FFI would be strictly less powerful
>> than the d
Mark H Weaver skribis:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> Mark H Weaver skribis:
>>
>>> At some point, it might make sense to create a more static FFI that
>>> works more like a C compiler does, splitting the job into compile-time
>>> and run-time phases. This static FFI would be str
