Hi,
On Tue 29 Jan 2013 18:09, Mark H Weaver writes:
> Having slept on this, I think I agree that 'open-input-file' should
> auto-consume BOMs.
Patch attached.
> However, 'open-input-file' should not auto-detect the encoding by
> default,
The ball is in your court now :)
> and should only con
Hi,
I just release guile-json 0.1.0.
https://github.com/aconchillo/guile-json
This is my first guile related release, so comments are more than welcome.
guile-json is a JSON module for Guile. It supports parsing and
building JSON documents according to the http:://json.org
specification. Th
On Wed, 2013-01-30 at 01:48 -0800, Aleix Conchillo Flaqué wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just release guile-json 0.1.0.
>
> https://github.com/aconchillo/guile-json
>
> This is my first guile related release, so comments are more than welcome.
>
> guile-json is a JSON module for Guile. It supports pars
Aleix Conchillo Flaqué writes:
> Hi,
>
> I just release guile-json 0.1.0.
>
> https://github.com/aconchillo/guile-json
>
Nice. Looks like you have a small typo in README.org:
diff --git a/README.org b/README.org
index e7d9c91..a10d75a 100644
--- a/README.org
+++ b/README.org
@@ -93,7 +93,7
Aleix Conchillo Flaqué writes:
> I just release guile-json 0.1.0.
>
> https://github.com/aconchillo/guile-json
I've uploaded it to my guildhall repo. Current users can
guild update
guild install json
to obtain it. People who aren't using Guildhall can find instructions at
https://githu
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 9:17 AM, Billy O'Connor wrote:
>
> Nice. Looks like you have a small typo in README.org:
>
Thanks! Fixed.
Aleix
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Ian Price wrote:
>
> I've uploaded it to my guildhall repo. Current users can
>
> guild update
> guild install json
>
> to obtain it. People who aren't using Guildhall can find instructions at
> https://github.com/ijp/guildhall/wiki/Getting-Started
>
Thanks I
Hello!
Andy Wingo skribis:
> On Tue 29 Jan 2013 18:09, Mark H Weaver writes:
[...]
>> However, 'open-input-file' should not auto-detect the encoding by
>> default,
>
> The ball is in your court now :)
Can we discuss this one in the other thread, so my little brain and
mailbox don’t get confu
Hello all,
I researched this some more, and discovered that removal of byte-order
marks (BOMs) is the responsibility of iconv, which discards BOMs from
the beginning of streams when using the UTF-16 or UTF-32 encodings, but
*not* for UTF-16LE, UTF-16GE, UTF-32LE, UTF-32GE or any other encoding.
It
Andy Wingo writes:
> On Tue 15 Jan 2013 10:32, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>> As usual, backward-compatibility gives us an incentive not to change
>> anything in 2.0. But perhaps we should change that in 2.2.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>
> IMO we should update the docs and leave it as it is, thou
10 matches
Mail list logo