On Tue 22 Jan 2013 15:31, Daniel Llorens writes:
> On Jan 21, 2013, at 17:11, Andy Wingo wrote:
>
> The patch attached applies over yours and is to document this function
> and a couple others in the manual.
Thanks, applied and pushed to wip-generalized-vectors.
> Maybe we should have scm_array
Hi,
On Wed 23 Jan 2013 00:27, Daniel Llorens writes:
> I guess I don't value that much having a specific interface just for
> rank 1 objects.
I don't care much either; I don't think I have ever used the generalized
vector routines. If I wanted real polymorphism, I think I would also
want it ov
On Wed 07 Mar 2012 17:32, Nala Ginrut writes:
> I found current read-delimited will return the whole string if delimiter
> can't be found. It's inconvenient for some cases.
>
> I expect it return #f for this.
> And Andy said it maybe because some back compatible reasons. So I decide
> to add an o
On Wed, 2013-01-23 at 11:00 +0100, Andy Wingo wrote:
> On Wed 07 Mar 2012 17:32, Nala Ginrut writes:
>
> > I found current read-delimited will return the whole string if delimiter
> > can't be found. It's inconvenient for some cases.
> >
> > I expect it return #f for this.
> > And Andy said it ma
As I talked with Andy, we may add a feature to list all available
languages. And if users add a new language to the %load-path, they may
see it listed out. Besides, this feature could be used in 'guild
compile' to detect all the language available.
Attached is a proc named 'get-all-available-langu
On Jan 23, 2013, at 10:06, Andy Wingo wrote:
> For C, that makes sense. Something should be done for Scheme as well,
> but it's not terribly urgent. Perhaps make scm_array_ref not be bound
> to "array-ref", and instead bind "array-ref" to some function that takes
> two optional arguments and a
Hi!
Andy Wingo skribis:
> What is a vector?
>
> Possible answers:
>
> 1. A vector is something that answers #t to vector?, which contains
> some number of storage slots accessible in a mostly-O(1) way, the
> number of slots is given by vector-length, and the slots can be
> accessed with
Hi,
Just a note that I have merged stable-2.0 to master, and rebased wip-rtl
on top of that.
`master' should build and pass make check for everyone. If that is not
the case, please let me know.
Thanks,
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
On Sun 14 Oct 2012 21:59, Noah Lavine writes:
> I have been working on understanding RTL, and I wrote the following
> tests. They're mostly to illustrate for myself how calling works in
> RTL, but they also serve to test it. Any objections if I commit them
> as part of rtl.test?
Committed, thank
Hi Noah,
A brief note to let you know that I rebased wip-rtl-cps, as wip-rtl
itself was rebased.
Cheers,
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
Hi Andy,
Andy Wingo writes:
> On Thu 29 Nov 2012 23:42, Mark H Weaver writes:
>
>> SCM
>> scm_local_eval (SCM exp, SCM env)
>> {
>> static SCM local_eval_var = SCM_BOOL_F;
>>
>> if (scm_is_false (local_eval_var))
>> local_eval_var = scm_c_public_variable ("ice-9 local-eval",
>> "local-e
I wrote:
> For a good introduction to what is needed to write robust multithreaded
> code on modern weakly-ordered memory architectures, I recommend the
> following article:
>
> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2007/n2480.html
and if you want a deeper understanding of what's goin
Hi Andy:
Thanks for your patient help. GNU make and friends is entirely new to me at the
detail level.
I did the following (starting from scratch):
(0) Starting with the guile-2.0.7 tar ball
./configure && make && make check
This used gcc and had 77 warnings and 1 test failure
bad return from
Hi,
I managed to do what you said, the result is at
https://gitorious.org/syntax-closures
I changed it so that it is enough to do
(use-modules (srfi srfi-72))
and hacking along with it using both
#, and #,@
Especially #,@ was difficult but using the ck macro
the appending become more natural.
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 8:24 AM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe <
stefan.ita...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I managed to do what you said, the result is at
>
> https://gitorious.org/syntax-closures
>
> I changed it so that it is enough to do
>
> (use-modules (srfi srfi-72))
>
Note SRFI-72 is not an impl
Hi Alex!
> Note SRFI-72 is not an implementation of syntactic-closures.
> It's an alternate hygiene algorithm closer to the R6RS one which
> includes a compatible syntax-case and some convenience utilities.
To comments to this:
1. The main reason for SRFI-72 is to e.g. capture the let bound y in
16 matches
Mail list logo
