Hi Thien-Thi!
Thien-Thi Nguyen skribis:
> Looking to move WIKID[0] out of the Guile 1.4.x ghetto (which is pretty
> cozy, i must say),
(Speaking of which, do let me know when rpx has left the ghetto, too. :-))
> i ran into a Guile 1.8 problem. Apparently, ‘send’ gratuitously
> demands its MES
> From: Ludovic Courtès
>> I imagine if this particular fix goes smoothly, i will be motivated to
>> continue w/ this kind of maintenance work, where the focus is on
>> continuity and stability (perhaps likewise showing 1.6 and 1.4 some
>> love, as well).
>
> Hmm, I’d find it more important
Any objections if I apply these patches soon? I'd like to get them off
of my to do list.
Thanks,
Noah
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Noah Lavine wrote:
> And here is a patch to remove all of the @twerp* comments. But did you
> mean that I should remove them in the same patches that import the
Hi guilers,
In my zeal to get more packages up on my guildhall repo, I packaged the
portable r6rs srfi collection[0]. However, this particular package runs
into some trouble when it is installed.
The issue is, the portable srfi collection uses srfi 97 names[1], for
libraries along with a common
Hello all,
As some of you are aware, I am in the process of packaging pieces of
software for a repository to be used with the guildhall package
manager for guile 2[0].
This is just a quick update on the progress of that, and a small
enticement to try to convince you to test it out[1]. Remember l
