hi guys!
I realized that our object->string will do some unnecessary works for
a string object.
--code--
(object->string "\n")
==> "\\n"
---end--
It's illogical! I get several errors when I'm reading xml files. It
generates too many "\\" that I must
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 12:16 AM, Andy Wingo wrote:
> On Mon 02 Jul 2012 09:53, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
> writes:
>
> > Anyway I can now compile simple functions to native sequences of machine
> code but with some
> > tools around it so let me explain the setup.
>
> Where is this code? Sorry for
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 12:41 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hey!
>
> Stefan Israelsson Tampe skribis:
>
> > Maybe this help to see what I'm after,
> >
> > #'(let ((x v)) #.(f #'x))
> >
> > <=>
> >
> > (let-syntax ((g (lambda (stx) (syntax-case stx ((_ x) (f #'x)
> >#'(let ((x v)) (g x))
>
Shouldn't the function return a string representing the object.rather than
the object itself, even for a string. It should be up to your application
to handle if it's a string imho.
On Jul 3, 2012 2:42 PM, "Nala Ginrut" wrote:
> hi guys!
> I realized that our object->string will do some unnecessa
Krister Svanlund wrote:
> Shouldn't the function return a string representing the object.rather than
> the object itself, even for a string. It should be up to your application
> to handle if it's a string imho.
> On Jul 3, 2012 2:42 PM, "Nala Ginrut" wrote:
>
> > hi guys!
> > I realized
Hey!
Stefan Israelsson Tampe skribis:
>> Stefan Israelsson Tampe skribis:
>>
>> > Maybe this help to see what I'm after,
>> >
>> > #'(let ((x v)) #.(f #'x))
>> >
>> > <=>
>> >
>> > (let-syntax ((g (lambda (stx) (syntax-case stx ((_ x) (f #'x)
>> >#'(let ((x v)) (g x))
[...]
> If you
Heya!
Andy Wingo skribis:
> scm->pointer takes a Scheme value and returns a Scheme value which is a
> foreign pointer to the Scheme value. It has been in Guile since 2.0 I
> think.
v2.0.0-105-g148c331, apparently.
> scm_to_pointer takes a Scheme value which is a foreign pointer, and
> unpacks
You do not need gensyms if you try to mimic or implement my suggested #. .
On the
other hand when if you do this
(define (f stx) #`(let ((x 1)) #,stx))
and use this with
#`(let ((x 2)) #,(f #'x))
the resulting expanded code would produce 1 which is not what you want.
So in the racket matcher I
@Krister
I thought it should be a generic requirement. And dsmich's answer
proved it. It should be the duty of this API but the user choose the
output policy.
@dsmich
I confess I didn't read the manual carefully. Thanks for reminding.
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 3:34 AM, wrote:
>
> Krister Svan
