Hello!
On 05/29/12 at 03:54pm, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Jan Synacek skribis:
>
> > Hm, this is weird. So TeXmacs seems to bundle the same eval.scm as guile has
> > (among others)?
>
> You mean TeXmacs ships a file called ice-9/eval.scm? If that is the
> case, we’re in trouble.
It doe
Hi,
Jan Synacek skribis:
> Texmacs complains when started:
>
> Backtrace:
> In unknown file:
>?: 7 [boot-closure #t # ...]
>?: 6 [catch-closure]
>?: 5 [boot-closure #t # #]
>?: 4 [catch-closure]
>?: 3 [boot-closure #t # #]
>?: 2 [catch-closure]
>?: 1 [primitive-eval
Hello!
Commit b22e94db7c91d7661204e33f3bc2bfead002c9b7 adds
‘%default-port-conversion-strategy’, a natural friend of
‘%default-port-encoding’.
First, I’m wondering whether ‘port’ should be part of the name, given
that it’s also referred to by ‘scm_stringn’ & co. It’s good to have it
in the name,
>Second, in commit 9f6e3f5a997f484548bd03e7e7573c38a95c8d09, I changed
>string ports to honor it, like other port types, instead of forcing
>'error. This seems like the right thing to me, for the sake of
>consistency (in fact, I’d consider the previous behavior as a bug), but
>it’s an observable c
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 10:58 PM, Nala Ginrut wrote:
> Well, speaking this. I have a question that, is there any convenient
> way to add multi-backend in Guile?
It depends on what you mean by that.
You can add as many low-level languages as you like, including a GCC
interface, machine code, and
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hello!
>
> Commit b22e94db7c91d7661204e33f3bc2bfead002c9b7 adds
> ‘%default-port-conversion-strategy’, a natural friend of
> ‘%default-port-encoding’.
>
> First, I’m wondering whether ‘port’ should be part of the name, given
> that it’s also referred to by
