Re: Inclusion of guile-log

2012-03-27 Thread Thien-Thi Nguyen
() Stefan Israelsson Tampe () Tue, 27 Mar 2012 00:02:06 +0200 What do you think? IMO, bundling it w/ Guile is not a good idea, independent of the code's other merits.

Re: Comments on ‘wip-nio’

2012-03-27 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Andy Wingo skribis: > On Wed 21 Mar 2012 23:39, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > >> I had a quick look at ‘wip-nio’, and here are initial comments. > > Thanks for the feedback! > >> • epoll is Linux-specific. Any idea how a more multi-platform API >> could be provided? I gues

Re: wip-threads-and-fork

2012-03-27 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Andy Wingo skribis: > On Wed 21 Mar 2012 22:26, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: [...] >> Yes, things like ‘open-process’ make sense. >> >> What about adding a big fat warning in the doc about use of >> ‘primitive-fork’ in a multi-threaded program? > > Sure. WDYT about a warning at

Do we want more latin1-specific procedures?

2012-03-27 Thread Mark H Weaver
Hi Andy, I see that you've added a bunch of latin1-specific procedures to the ethreads branch, which I guess is part of your optimization work. I'm very concerned about adding more latin1-specific code (and even worse, interfaces), given that the world is clearly moving to UTF-8, and given that w