Hi!
Andy Wingo skribis:
> I just fixed a long-standing memory leak in Guile 2.0. (I say that like
> I'm proud or something, but of course I was the one the introduced it in
> the first place!)
Excellent!
> See c05805a4ea764dec5a0559edefcdfb9761191d07 in stable-2.0 for the
> gnarly details. T
Hi,
Andy Wingo skribis:
> On Thu 15 Mar 2012 17:41, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> So if my recollection is correct, the ‘canonicalize-path’ call in
>> ‘current-filename’, which was controversial, can now be removed.
>>
>> Andy: WDYT?
>
> Well it's not what I wanted, but I don't car
Hi,
Andy Wingo skribis:
> That's the mechanism. But we should talk policy. This should probably
> not emit a warning:
>
> (begin
> (define _ gettext)
> (format #t (_ "foo")))
>
> And this should:
>
> (begin
> (define _ not-gettext)
> (format #t (_ "foo")))
>
> But the probl
Hello!
(With delay...)
Andy Wingo skribis:
> I would have preferred this, but I came to the conclusion that this
> approach is not sound.
Without exposing ‘pthread_atfork’, how would you suggest making user
code “fork-safe”? A use case would be reviving the futures thread pool
after ‘fork’.
Hi,
If you wondered about the results of my endavour with logic programming for
guile I
finally made a repo that is self containd and does not mode guile (HORROR
STORIES HERE)
Anyway here is the link for the repo at gitorius,
https://gitorious.org/gule-log/guile-log
I just added a small repo wi
Hi BT,
The patch doesn’t apply currently on stable-2.0. Could you send an
updated one, or apply it yourself?
Thanks,
Ludo’.
This is very cool. Thank you for telling us about it!
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If you wondered about the results of my endavour with logic programming for
> guile I
> finally made a repo that is self containd and does not mode guile (HORROR
> STORI
On Wed 21 Mar 2012 22:02, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>> See c05805a4ea764dec5a0559edefcdfb9761191d07 in stable-2.0 for the
>> gnarly details. The summary is that applicable smobs were being leaked,
>> because they were referenced in the values of weak-key tables.
>
> I was wondering w
Hello,
I had a quick look at ‘wip-nio’, and here are initial comments.
• epoll is Linux-specific. Any idea how a more multi-platform API
could be provided? I guess libevent could be used, but we don’t
want to add one more dependency in 2.0. How much is (ice-9 nio)
dependent on ep
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 6:39 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I had a quick look at ‘wip-nio’, and here are initial comments.
>
> • epoll is Linux-specific. Any idea how a more multi-platform API
>could be provided? I guess libevent could be used, but we don’t
>want to add one m
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 5:26 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hello!
>
> (With delay...)
>
> Andy Wingo skribis:
>
> > I would have preferred this, but I came to the conclusion that this
> > approach is not sound.
>
> Without exposing ‘pthread_atfork’, how would you suggest making user
> code “fork-
11 matches
Mail list logo