Re: My Guile TODO list

2012-03-09 Thread Nala Ginrut
well, I think the real worth of this TODO list is, I don't bother to think what can I do for Guile. I can steal some of them and go for it before you done it. ;-) On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 3:53 AM, Mark H Weaver wrote: > Hello all, > > I occasionally talk about my large Guile TODO list, and someti

Re: [Feature Request] How about a "--minimum-mode" option?

2012-03-09 Thread Nala Ginrut
And can I get rid of GOOPS too? 2012/3/8 Ludovic Courtès > Hi, > > Nala Ginrut skribis: > > > Is there a way to configure Guile as a minimum one? > > Or maybe another question: is there an official way to cut Guile small? > > There are a few configure options to disable features: > > --disable

Re: [Feature Request] How about a "--minimum-mode" option?

2012-03-09 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Nala Ginrut skribis: > And can I get rid of GOOPS too? No. Ludo'.

Re: Build Error in Master

2012-03-09 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi Noah! Noah Lavine skribis: > When building the latest git master, I get this error: > > GUILEC language/tree-il/compile-glil.go > Assertion failed: (table->n_items < size), function rob_from_rich, > file weak-table.c, line 252. I’m seeing that too sometimes when running ./check-guile, with

Re: [Feature Request] How about a "--minimum-mode" option?

2012-03-09 Thread Mark H Weaver
Nala Ginrut writes: > Is there a way to configure Guile as a minimum one?  > > Or maybe another question: is there an official way to cut Guile > small? This is a common request, and I'd like to try to improve this for 2.2, but it's a big job. As you can see, my TODO list includes several items

Re: My Guile TODO list

2012-03-09 Thread Mark H Weaver
Nala Ginrut writes: > well, I think the real worth of this TODO list is, I don't bother to > think what can I do for Guile. I can steal some of them and go for it > before you done it. ;-) Please do! Unless others help with this list, there is little hope that it can all be done. I see you are

Re: Autocompilation/LilyPond

2012-03-09 Thread Mark H Weaver
David Kastrup writes: > How is this supposed to work for compiling and installing a package? > Basically, > > make all > sudo make install > > The usual case will be that the user calling lilypond will not have > write permission in the installed directories (and even if he did, like > when calli

Re: Autocompilation/LilyPond

2012-03-09 Thread David Kastrup
Mark H Weaver writes: > David Kastrup writes: > >> How is this supposed to work for compiling and installing a package? >> Basically, >> >> make all >> sudo make install >> >> The usual case will be that the user calling lilypond will not have >> write permission in the installed directories (an

Re: Autocompilation/LilyPond

2012-03-09 Thread Mark H Weaver
David Kastrup writes: >> In the long run, I think this is probably your best way forward, but >> admittedly it would require more work to make this transition. > > The main problem is that it requires such a large reorganisation of the > LilyPond sources that the attempts to do it in that manner

Re: My Guile TODO list

2012-03-09 Thread Mark H Weaver
Hi Andy, Andy Wingo writes: > On Wed 07 Mar 2012 20:53, Mark H Weaver writes: > >> I occasionally talk about my large Guile TODO list, and sometimes people >> say that I should put it somewhere public. Okay, here it is (not >> including my ticked messages in Gnus). It includes some items that

Re: My Guile TODO list

2012-03-09 Thread Mark H Weaver
Hi Ludovic, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Mark H Weaver skribis: > >> I occasionally talk about my large Guile TODO list, and sometimes people >> say that I should put it somewhere public. Okay, here it is (not >> including my ticked messages in Gnus). It includes some items that are

Re: Autocompilation/LilyPond

2012-03-09 Thread David Kastrup
Mark H Weaver writes: > David Kastrup writes: > >>> In the long run, I think this is probably your best way forward, but >>> admittedly it would require more work to make this transition. >> >> The main problem is that it requires such a large reorganisation of the >> LilyPond sources that the a

Re: Questions about the compiler et al

2012-03-09 Thread BT Templeton
Mark H Weaver writes: > Andy Wingo writes: >>> * Is there any way to embed references to non-serializable objects in >>> compiled code? >> >> No. Can you give an example of when you would want this? [...] > Furthermore, I'd suggest that _not_ serializing the objtable should be > the default b