I'd like to make one last plea to include my simple `local-eval'
implementation in 2.0.4. My hope is that if we can ship it soon enough,
versions of Guile without `local-eval' will be rare enough to enable
Lilypond to eliminate their ugly hacks and simply declare that Guile
2.0.0-2.0.3 are unsuppo
Hi Mark,
Mark H Weaver skribis:
> What do other people think?
As you said, R5RS makes it clear that there can be several (in the sense
of eq?) empty strings, so I think what you did is the right thing.
Thanks!
Ludo’.
Hello!
Andy Wingo skribis:
> I think 2012 will be a good year for Guile. We'll be solidifying the
> 2.0 series, even as we start producing the first pre-release or two of
> 2.2. I would really love to get a register VM and a first stab at
> native compilation out this year. We'll see.
Sounds
On 01/12/12 13:43, Mark H Weaver wrote:
I worked very hard to produce a simple and maintainable implementation
of `local-eval' in time for 2.0.4, so that we might rectify this
unfortunate Lilypond unhappiness. It would be a shame if that work were
wasted.
Just for the record, I'm okay with tak
