Mark H Weaver writes:
> Ideally I'd like to allow the user to specify a precise list of
> variables to capture, and perhaps the other two variants should be
> implemented in terms of this one.
If you have to specify a precise _list_ of variables, the-environment is
pretty pointless since you can
Hi David,
David Kastrup writes:
> Noah Lavine writes:
>
>> Okay, let me see if this is right now.
>>
>> In the expression
>>
>> (list (call-with-current-continuation func) (+ 4 14)),
>>
>> you want the addition to be done before the
>> call-with-current-continuation, as opposed to being part
Bruce Korb writes:
> On 01/07/12 08:38, Mark H Weaver wrote:
>> * Add checks to all string mutation functions: if the range is empty,
>>then avoid calling `scm_i_string_start_writing'.
>
> Yes. All of them. All four.
For the record, there were 7 string mutation functions to fix :-P
Anyway,
On 01/09/12 07:41, Mark H Weaver wrote:
Yes. All of them. All four.
For the record, there were 7 string mutation functions to fix :-P
I guess my cscope search was not exhaustive enough.
Thanks! We are talking 2.0.4, yes? When might that be? :)
Regards, Bruce
On Mon 09 Jan 2012 18:27, Bruce Korb writes:
> We are talking 2.0.4, yes? When might that be? :)
A week? :)
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
On 01/09/12 10:32, Andy Wingo wrote:
On Mon 09 Jan 2012 18:27, Bruce Korb writes:
We are talking 2.0.4, yes? When might that be? :)
A week? :)
Wonderful! I just wanted reassurance it wasn't months.
My own round tuits for hobby time things are often measured in months. :(
Just a brief note to say that I merged stable-2.0 to master, and that
I'm aware that there is one failing test there. Not sure what the right
fix is there.
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
Hi-
So I was reading through the reference manual. There is the
"API Reference" and "Guile Modules" chapter followed by the
"Standard Library" chapter. I know historically why they
are separated that way, but if you didn't know about guile-lib
you aren't going to understand why they're divided t
