Marco Maggi writes:
> David Kastrup wrote:
>> Hi, if I have something read that is evaluated later, the
>> lack of procedure-environment in Guilev2 implies that I
>> have to wrap the stuff in (lambda () ...) in order to
>> capture the lexical environment for evaluation.
>
> Sorry to step
David Kastrup writes:
> Marco Maggi writes:
>
>> David Kastrup wrote:
>>> Hi, if I have something read that is evaluated later, the
>>> lack of procedure-environment in Guilev2 implies that I
>>> have to wrap the stuff in (lambda () ...) in order to
>>> capture the lexical environment f
David Kastrup writes:
> Basically I need to evaluate dynamic code in a given lexical environment
> rather than at top and/or module level.
>
> For a language that is supposed to be a building block for extension
> languages, not really a concept that is all that unusual I would think.
Guile 2 is
Mark H Weaver writes:
> David Kastrup writes:
>> Basically I need to evaluate dynamic code in a given lexical environment
>> rather than at top and/or module level.
>>
>> For a language that is supposed to be a building block for extension
>> languages, not really a concept that is all that unus
