Re: [PATCH] Add "scandir" procedure

Hi, Andy Wingo skribis: > On Tue 30 Aug 2011 18:06, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > >> I was actually planning to push ‘file-system-fold’, a functional >> alternative to ‘ftw’, which would be along the lines of this (from >>

Re: [PATCH] Add "scandir" procedure

Heya, On Sat 10 Dec 2011 15:52, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Andy Wingo skribis: > >> On Tue 30 Aug 2011 18:06, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: >> >>> I was actually planning to push ‘file-system-fold’, a functional >>> alternative to ‘ftw’, which would be along the lines of t

extensibility, compatible changes, and ocap security

Hi, I was compiling guile-gnome recently, saw a warning about a srfi-39 binding replacement, and went to go look at srfi-39 in Guile. That's the `parameterize' library, you see. It is unnecessary, given that `parameterize' is now in boot-9, but there is a wrinkle: srfi-39 requires that `current-

Re: [PATCH] Add "scandir" procedure

Hello! Andy Wingo skribis: > On Sat 10 Dec 2011 15:52, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: [...] >> Yes. The mixture of concerns in that function is not brilliant, but >> OTOH it’s probably good to have a function people are familiar with. > > Yeah, I have the same thoughts. OTOH, if fil