ri...@happyleptic.org writes:
> You seam to believe that there is on one hand the guile developers and
> on another one the guile users, facing each others on the ground of
> some kind of contract that's being somewhat abused by the developers.
> In reality, guile is a project belonging to the com
"Chris K. Jester-Young" writes:
> On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 10:23:25AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> Well, you'd need to have
>>
>> (call-with-values (lambda () *unspecified*) (lambda x (length x))) => 0
> [...]
>> That means that one _only_ needs to consider the implications on
>> call-with-va
On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 09:42:36AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> So here is another proposal: (values) is not the same as *unspecified*.
> But if you take the first value of a values list in single-value
> contexts, there is nothing about that coercion mechanism that would keep
> you from using *un
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 12:09:12AM +0100, Andy Wingo wrote:
> One change was to make GC run more often when a process is growing, in
> terms of resident memory size. This seems to be a good idea in general.
>
> The other was to add a function that users can call to note
> non-gc-managed allocatio
"Chris K. Jester-Young" writes:
> On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 09:42:36AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
>> So here is another proposal: (values) is not the same as *unspecified*.
>> But if you take the first value of a values list in single-value
>> contexts, there is nothing about that coercion mechani
David Kastrup writes:
> So here is another proposal: (values) is not the same as *unspecified*.
> But if you take the first value of a values list in single-value
> contexts, there is nothing about that coercion mechanism that would keep
> you from using *unspecified* whenever that values list wo
On Thu 08 Dec 2011 16:46, "Chris K. Jester-Young" writes:
> Alas, part of that diff also breaks libgc 7.1 (which is the version that
> Debian currently has packaged), which lack the unmapping functions.
> Here's my diff to make it work again.
Thanks for the patch! In the future a git-format-pat
Hi David,
Again, thank you for your bug reports, but Guile development is not
driven by shame. So please keep up your (useful!) bug reports, but try
to give them a more positive flavor :)
Thanks,
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
Andy Wingo writes:
> Again, thank you for your bug reports, but Guile development is not
> driven by shame.
Obviously.
> So please keep up your (useful!) bug reports, but try to give them a
> more positive flavor :)
Could you give an example how to deliver with a positive flavor a report
about
On Thu 08 Dec 2011 21:32, David Kastrup writes:
>> So please keep up your (useful!) bug reports, but try to give them a
>> more positive flavor :)
>
> Could you give an example how to deliver with a positive flavor a report
> about deprecation messages talking about the wrong function, telling yo
Stefan Israelsson Tampe writes:
> So I tried to get hold of the macro binding. So with the following patch wich
> should be enogh
> for me to make progress porting rackets syntax parse to guile.
>
> Would be very glad if we could find a interface to expose this information
> that is sane
> and
Andy Wingo writes:
> On Thu 08 Dec 2011 21:32, David Kastrup writes:
>
>>> So please keep up your (useful!) bug reports, but try to give them a
>>> more positive flavor :)
>>
>> Could you give an example how to deliver with a positive flavor a report
>> about deprecation messages talking about t
David Kastrup wrote:
> Andy Wingo writes:
>
> > On Thu 08 Dec 2011 21:32, David Kastrup writes:
> >
> >>> So please keep up your (useful!) bug reports, but try to give them a
> >>> more positive flavor :)
> >>
> >> Could you give an example how to deliver with a positive flavor a report
13 matches
Mail list logo
