Hi Volker,
On Sat 23 Apr 2011 18:10, Volker Grabsch writes:
> Andy Wingo schrieb:
>> Hmmm. Well. We have other code generators in Guile's build system;
>> notably the configure script (via config.h and other output files).
>> What do folks think about the attached patch?
>
> Please drop me a n
Hi Marco,
Marco Maggi writes:
> Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>
However, I’m wondering whether we should not just
squarely do away with the binary/textual distinction
>
> How would you handle port position?
Currently port position is in bytes for all kinds of ports (info
"(guile) Rand
On Sat 23 Apr 2011 21:46, Mark Harig writes:
> Here is a set of patches to add the new section "Invoking Guile" to
> the chapter "Programming in Scheme."
They look good in general, though I have some comments. I would like
Neil to look over them as well, or at least say he's OK with them.
Firs
Hi Mark,
Thanks for the revisions.
On Sun 24 Apr 2011 22:36, Mark Harig writes:
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 04:33:44PM +0200, Andy Wingo wrote:
>> your patches should be "atomic"
>
> "3. No patch introduces a regression: after applying any
> initial part of the series, the resulting project still
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 11:00:16PM +0200, Andy Wingo wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> Thanks for the revisions.
>
> On Sun 24 Apr 2011 22:36, Mark Harig writes:
>
> > On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 04:33:44PM +0200, Andy Wingo wrote:
> >> your patches should be "atomic"
> >
> > "3. No patch introduces a regre
Le Sun, 24 Apr 2011 23:00:16 +0200,
Andy Wingo a écrit :
> Hi Mark,
>
> Thanks for the revisions.
> ..
Hello Mark,
Andy,
While you are at the manual, may I point to some suggestion I made about the
structure and contents of the indexes which still is, IMHO, valid today.
[wanted to
actually re
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 07:09:07PM -0300, David Pirotte wrote:
> While you are at the manual, may I point to some
> suggestion I made about the structure and contents of the
> indexes which still is, IMHO, valid today. [wanted to
> actually really point the email in guile-devel archive but
> but
Hello,
> I do not know how you are reading the Guile Reference
> Manual, but the printed version is about 809 pages long. At
> present, the indices run from page 755 to 809, so the
> revision that is suggested, above, would not be small.
>
> What would be of some help to get this project started
> Well, is the code a piece of string ? Does that mean we'll have code
> generation on-the-fly facilities? ^_^
>
yes. you don't need to convert var's type, this module does it automatic
for you.
> By the way, do you like the idea of some kind of inline C-code
> "segments" embed in scm files? (J
