On Tue 22 Mar 2011 14:26, Ian Price writes:
> If you run (exit) at the repl, it is caught, and any after-thunks from
> dynamic-wind will be called when you continue with ,q . However, in a
> guile script, it is not an error, and the after-thunks are not
> called.
I have tracked this down and it
Hi Andreas!
Andreas Rottmann writes:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
[...]
>> Could you send a patch to update the manual?
>>
> I have started working on this,
Great!
> but I'm notorious (at least to myself) for starving
> documentation-related work with interesting coding stuff tha
Hello,
Andreas Rottmann writes:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
[...]
>> I think it would make sense to include ‘fmt’ in core Guile only if the
>> API is reasonably stable and there are infrequent upstream releases, so
>> we don’t quickly end up shipping an old incompatible version.
>
On Fri 18 Mar 2011 22:16, Noah Lavine writes:
>> The problem is that modules are resolved at compile-time, in addition to
>> run-time, so there just can’t be circular dependencies.
>
> It's true that a module couldn't depend, at compile-time, on a module
> that was only available at run-time. How
Hi Andreas,
I’m all for your suggestion.
Andreas Rottmann writes:
> + (define-syntax define-fxop*
> +(syntax-rules ()
> + ((_ name op)
> + (define name
> + (case-lambda
> +((x y)
> + (assert-fixnum x y)
> + (op x y))
> +(args
> + (ass
Hi!
Andreas Rottmann writes:
> +SCM_DEFINE (scm_fixnum_p, "fixnum?", 1, 0, 0,
> +(SCM x),
> +"Return @code{#t} if @var{x} is a fixnum, @code{#f} otherwise.")
> +#define FUNC_NAME s_scm_fixnum_p
> +{
> + return scm_from_bool (SCM_I_INUMP (x));
> +}
> +#undef FUNC_NAME
Fo
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> I’m all for your suggestion.
>
> Andreas Rottmann writes:
>
>> + (define-syntax define-fxop*
>> +(syntax-rules ()
>> + ((_ name op)
>> + (define name
>> + (case-lambda
>> + ((x y)
>> +(assert-fixnum x y)
>>
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hi!
>
> Andreas Rottmann writes:
>
>> +SCM_DEFINE (scm_fixnum_p, "fixnum?", 1, 0, 0,
>> +(SCM x),
>> +"Return @code{#t} if @var{x} is a fixnum, @code{#f} otherwise.")
>> +#define FUNC_NAME s_scm_fixnum_p
>> +{
>> + return scm_from_
Andy Wingo writes:
> I have pushed something that causes the stack to be unwound before
> exiting. Please let me know if you still see problems.
Unfortunately, yes. Now when snarf-check-and-output-texi is run, I see:
| GENguile-procedures.texi
| guile: uncaught throw to wrong-type-arg:
