Re: reprise: scm_c_eval_string_from_file_line

Hi Andy, On 03/09/11 12:15, Andy Wingo wrote: >>> So, this should go under: >>> #if GUILE_VERSION > 20 // anything after 2.0, e.g. 2.0.1 ?? >> >> Rather use AC_CHECK_FUNC. > > You'd have to check for (ice-9 eval-string) as well, added at the same > time. Then scm_call_5 implies (ice-9 eval-s

uc_tolower (uc_toupper (x))

I've noticed that srfi-13.c very frequently does: uc_tolower (uc_toupper (x)) Is there a good reason to do this instead of: uc_tolower (x) ? Mark

Re: uc_tolower (uc_toupper (x))

> From:Mark H Weaver > To:guile-devel@gnu.org > Cc: > Sent:Thursday, March 10, 2011 3:39 PM > Subject:uc_tolower (uc_toupper (x)) > > I've noticed that srfi-13.c very frequently does: > >   uc_tolower (uc_toupper (x)) > > Is there a good reason to do this instead of: > >   uc_tolower (x) Unic