Hi Mark,
On Sat 19 Feb 2011 00:54, Mark H Weaver writes:
> Andy Wingo writes:
>> Compatible changes on 2.0.x seem fine to me; we should live in 2.0.x
>> for a year or two I think.
>
> What do you mean by "live in 2.0.x"? Does this mean that we should
> avoid working on deeper changes to Guile
Hi Andy,
Andy Wingo writes:
> [...] What I meant was that we should aim for a 2.2.0 release within a
> year ot two; and that in the meantime we should focus on consolidating
> our gains with the 2.0 series. We need to get 2.0 into the distros,
> to see wider use of 2.0, and that will take a litt
