Hi,
> However, I have a suspicion something odd is going on and this does
> not contain all of the work it should from guile's repo. I ended up
> having to use git cherry-pick instead of git rebase because I had made
> a mistake when I first made my local peg branch. I checked out
> origin/wip-mlu
Noah Lavine writes:
> Hello Mark,
>
> I haven't read through all of the discussion yet, but it's obvious
> that you have good reasons for wanting (* 0 X) to be NaN when X is
NB (and for the record), "NaN" here should be "inexact".
Mark H Weaver writes:
> Neil Jerram writes:
>>
>> In other words, the argument is that any inexact number might actually
>> be infinite. (Right?)
>
> Yes.
>
>> That strikes me as stretching the idea of inexactness too far; and also
>> as not useful, because I'm sure there are many practical way
