Hi,
Alex Shinn writes:
> The default matcher in Racket is extensible by dispatching
> on the first symbol in each list, so a pair is (cons a b) and a
> list would be (list a b c). This is slightly more verbose, and
> looks like how you would generate the data rather than its
> actual structure,
Hi Alex,
On Monday, September 13, 2010 04:32:13 am Alex Shinn wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 6:15 AM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
>
> wrote:
> > I just wanted to share some ideas that come to my mind to churn the
> > prolog into something more useful.
>
> Have you played with schelog and kanren?
