() Andy Wingo
() Mon, 28 Jun 2010 15:44:54 +0200
Sorry for the long delay in response.
What does NFC mean?
See LibreDWG HACKING (and build-aux/create-changelog), for more info:
git://git.sv.gnu.org/libredwg.git
It's useful to distinguish between "important" and "unimportant"
changes, especi
Hello!
Looking at bug #21790, it occurred to me that the options listed in
‘private-options.h’ are (1) not private, and (2) mostly abandoned.
They’ve never been private and their Scheme counterpart (‘eval-options’,
‘debug-options’ & co.) are clearly public.
The eval & debug options are largely a
Hi Andy -
Thanks for the reply. I think SIGPIPE is indeed the right thing to do. I
ended
up adding a sighandler to my application and it solved the problem. I suppose
it
would be nice for Guile to at least display the error on exit - as in the gdb
REPL example of yours, if not throw an exce
Hi Thien-Thi,
Let me say first that I am really happy to have your energetic,
experienced hand going over Guile sources. Thank you! I do think that
small things are important, and your willingness to look at the small
*and* the big is much appreciated. It's nice to have thoughtful, local
commits.
On Fri 27 Aug 2010 07:01, Jon Herron writes:
> Hi Andy -
>
> Thanks for the reply. I think SIGPIPE is indeed the right thing to do. I
> ended
> up adding a sighandler to my application and it solved the problem. I suppose
> it
> would be nice for Guile to at least display the error on exit
On Fri 13 Aug 2010 13:18, No Itisnt writes:
> That was funny, just spent an hour trying to figure out what was wrong
> with my letrec when it was really that there's no explicit in-order?
> in the external representation anymore.
Ew, my apologies. Fixed, thanks!
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
On Thu 19 Aug 2010 09:04, Andy Wingo writes:
> Regarding modf -- it seems that the R6RS extends the definition of
> `modulo' (called `mod') to be defined over the real numbers.
>
> (mod 10 3) => 1
> (mod 10 3.0) => 1.0
> (mod 10 3.1) => 0.7
>
> This appears to be a compatible extension of t
On Fri 27 Aug 2010 08:16, Andy Wingo writes:
> On Fri 27 Aug 2010 01:29, Thien-Thi Nguyen writes:
>
>> I sidestepped [issues in guile-func-name-check], by rewriting in
>> Scheme (and using Emacs' ‘indent-sexp’). Unfortunately, it looks like
>> hydra is not liking it:
>>
>> http://hydra.nixos.or
() Andy Wingo
() Fri, 27 Aug 2010 13:15:32 -0700
I went to build a fresh Guile on a machine at work and realized that
this approach is quite slow, because it runs before the rest of Guile is
compiled.
It's much better code, but I think in order to snarf docs in Scheme we
need to d
Hello!
On Fri 27 Aug 2010 02:51, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> So, what do you think? What should be kept, deprecated, etc.?
MHO is that all of those symbols should be removed. We will need noop
shims so that we don't gratuitously break people's compiles, but I don't
think we want to
On Fri 27 Aug 2010 08:44, Andy Wingo writes:
> On Thu 19 Aug 2010 09:04, Andy Wingo writes:
>
>> Regarding modf -- it seems that the R6RS extends the definition of
>> `modulo' (called `mod') to be defined over the real numbers.
>>
>> (mod 10 3) => 1
>> (mod 10 3.0) => 1.0
>> (mod 10 3.1) =
11 matches
Mail list logo
