Hey,
Is there any scheme expression that will just get ignored when the
scheme code is compiled?
I'm generating some code with a function like:
(define (gen-update-ab updatea updateb)
`(begin
,(if updatea `(set! a (+ a 1)) `(donothing))
,(if updateb `(set! b (+ b 1)) `(donothing
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Michael Lucy wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Is there any scheme expression that will just get ignored when the
> scheme code is compiled?
>
> I'm generating some code with a function like:
>
> (define (gen-update-ab updatea updateb)
> `(begin
> ,(if updatea `(set! a (+ a 1
Doesn't look like it ignores it:
scheme@(guile-user)> ,c (begin (set! x 1))
Disassembly of #:
0(assert-nargs-ee/locals 0)
2(make-int8:1) ;; 1
3(load-symbol "x") ;; x
8(link-now)
9(variable-set)
10(void)
11(return)
sch
Hi Ludovic!
> There’s no ‘fold’ in R6RS-lib; it’s called ‘fold-left’.
Fixed -- see commit 5b379729bb5f5d06ceb02c4e96ccc62cf61f9c62.
> Should be “Guile’s core library (@pxref{List Modification}).”
Fixed.
> How about this instead:
>
> �...@code{div} is an alias for Guile’s @code{quotient} and
On Jun 23, 2010, at 17:09, Michael Lucy wrote:
> Is there any scheme expression that will just get ignored when the
> scheme code is compiled?
>
> I'm generating some code with a function like:
>
> (define (gen-update-ab updatea updateb)
> `(begin
> ,(if updatea `(set! a (+ a 1)) `(donothing
