Re: unified field theory!

2010-05-25 Thread stefan
> It does seem that you are nearing a point where your code can be > generally useful. What do you think about starting a project on savannah > or gitorious, and tracking your code in git, together with these test > cases? If you are not familiar with the process, we can help you out. It > would b

Re: fmatch

2010-05-25 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello, This patch lacks match.upstream.scm and is not in unidiff format, which makes it hard for me to read. Can you generate the patch, e.g., with git, using “git diff master” or some such? Thanks, Ludo’.

Re: Custom printers for SRFI-9 records

2010-05-25 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello! No Itisnt writes: > One thing I'm missing, and maybe I just didn't see it, is a way to > define custom printers for SRFI-9 records. I agree that it’s generally useful, but I think SRFI modules should not diverge from the spec, or when they do, make it separate, as was done with (srfi srf

(sxml match)

2010-05-25 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello! There’s now a new (sxml match) module, containing Jim Bender’s excellent SXML pattern matcher (released under the X11/MIT license): http://planet.plt-scheme.org/package-source/jim/sxml-match.plt/1/1/ I integrated the doc in the manual. Unfortunately it can’t be made to appear close to

Re: Custom printers for SRFI-9 records

2010-05-25 Thread No Itisnt
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 3:56 PM, No Itisnt wrote: > I agree. Here's a patch that adds (srfi srfi-9 gnu) with > set-record-printer! and adds a subsection to the SRFI-9 part of the > manual for it. > I can go ahead and commit it, if that's OK. > > On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Ludovic Courtès wr