Hi :)
On Tue 20 Apr 2010 01:12, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Andy Wingo writes:
>
>> I recently added a global fluid, %file-port-name-canonicalization, which
>> defaults to #f. But if it's 'absolute, the port name of a file port will
>> be canonicalized to the absolute path; or, if i
On Mon 19 Apr 2010 23:46, Thien-Thi Nguyen writes:
> () Andy Wingo
> () Mon, 19 Apr 2010 16:52:09 +0200
>
>Thoughts?
>
> It sounds complicated.
>
> Does the .go format support the usual ELF-y sections, like
> .rodata, .data, etc?
Nope, though we should just switch to use ELF at some point.
() Andy Wingo
() Tue, 20 Apr 2010 11:45:33 +0200
we should just switch to use ELF at some point.
OK, i'll keep my ear to the ground for that.
> Maybe we could just include the source
> verbatim in such a section (and avoid mapping it at runtime).
As Jao notes it is useful to be ab
() Andy Wingo
() Tue, 20 Apr 2010 11:42:58 +0200
I'd be happy to have some cleaner solution, though.
Do you have any ideas?
Another idea is to conceptually separate "filename" to be "directory"
and "basename" and have file ports maintain the directory portion as a
file descriptor (or equiv
() "Jose A. Ortega Ruiz"
() Tue, 20 Apr 2010 02:08:32 +0200
I'm not sure if i'm understanding you correctly, but if, by
source, you mean the scheme source, that'd be terrible news for
tools such as Geiser.
I'm not familiar w/ Geiser. What does it do? What are its restrictions?
thi
Ok,
I have started to code in some record recognition into the match construct
I need first to make sure that I grok the intention of the syntax!
Now, one can do ...
* (define rtf (make-record-type "n" '(x y z)))
* (define make-n (record-constructor rtf))
* (define v(make-n 1 2 3
Hi,
Andy Wingo writes:
> On Tue 20 Apr 2010 01:12, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> Andy Wingo writes:
>>
>>> I recently added a global fluid, %file-port-name-canonicalization, which
>>> defaults to #f. But if it's 'absolute, the port name of a file port will
>>> be canonicalized to
Thien-Thi Nguyen writes:
> () "Jose A. Ortega Ruiz"
> () Tue, 20 Apr 2010 02:08:32 +0200
>
>I'm not sure if i'm understanding you correctly, but if, by
>source, you mean the scheme source, that'd be terrible news for
>tools such as Geiser.
>
> I'm not familiar w/ Geiser. What does it
