Hello,
The nice thing about SMOBs is that they allow disjoint C types to be
mapped to disjoint Scheme types.
With ‘(system foreign)’, C pointers are mapped to Scheme foreign
objects, regardless of the type of object pointed to. Thus, to get
disjoint types in Scheme, foreign objects would need to
Hello Andy!
"Andy Wingo" writes:
> commit cee1d22c3c10b1892c82a5758ef69cd6fc9aba31
> Author: Andy Wingo
> Date: Mon Feb 22 23:00:19 2010 +0100
>
>actually capture partial continuations
[...]
> +#ifdef SCM_ALIGNED
> +#define SCM_DECLARE_STATIC_ALIGNED_ARRAY(type, sym)\
> +static const ty
Ken Raeburn writes:
> Ah, yeah, I meant to send email about that too. This patch should fix it,
> and bring it in line with the way the other source files are written:
>
> Use libguile/control.x explicitly.
Looks good to me; presumably you'll commit this?
Neil
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hello,
>
> The nice thing about SMOBs is that they allow disjoint C types to be
> mapped to disjoint Scheme types.
>
> With ‘(system foreign)’, C pointers are mapped to Scheme foreign
> objects, regardless of the type of object pointed to. Thus, to get
> d
"carlo.bramix" writes:
> Hello,
> after an hard work I was able to get an almost working build of the most
> recent guile.
> In the attached patch there are some little fixes and a bigger one, an almost
> complete and working implementation of posix mmap()/munmap() for Windows:
> this will all
On Feb 15, 2010, at 08:41, Ken Raeburn wrote:
> #1: c-tokenize.lex declares yyget_leng() as returning int, but the flex
> template defines it as returning yy_size_t (which is size_t, a.k.a. unsigned
> long), so c-tokenize.c doesn't compile. Changing the declaration in
> c-tokenize.lex to return
On Mar 1, 2010, at 14:24, Neil Jerram wrote:
> Looks good to me; presumably you'll commit this?
Sure, I'll check it in shortly.
I also just sent a couple of patches in other mail (subject "Re: build
problems"); Jose, you will probably need the patch to doc/ref/Makefile.am as
well.
Ken
