Re: patch: remove unused futures code

2009-10-31 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Fine with me too. Please apply! Thanks, Ludo'.

Re: compiling with -DSCM_DEBUG=1

2009-10-31 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello, Ken Raeburn writes: > GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE=0 \ > ../meta/uninstalled-env \ > guile-tools compile -Wunbound-variable -o "ice-9/debugger.go" > "../../ > guile/module/ice-9/debugger.scm" > Non-pair accessed with SCM_C[AD]R: `# . #{in

Re: two Mac guile patches

2009-10-31 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Fine with me too (although I’m not fond of the ‘glibtool’ hack just for the sake of Apple’s OS.) Thanks, Ludo’.

Re: compiling with -DSCM_DEBUG=1

2009-10-31 Thread Neil Jerram
Neil Jerram writes: > Ken Raeburn writes: > >> At Andy's suggestion, re-posting the still-pending part that needs >> review. Without these changes, the code in the loops applies SCM_CAR >> to non-pair objects. >> >> GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE=0 \ >> ../meta/uninstal

Re: Benchmark tracking

2009-10-31 Thread Neil Jerram
Mike Gran writes: > I did once play around with plotting the benchmarks.log files. > For your bemusement, I've attached a link to a script that I wrote. > > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guile.git/tree/benchmark-suite/benchplot?h=string_abstraction2 Thanks, Mike. I like the idea of generatin

Re: Benchmark tracking

2009-10-31 Thread Neil Jerram
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > And perhaps individual plots for each benchmark too. I've added those now. Please let me know if any comments or suggestions for improvement... Neil

Re: minor SCM_DEBUG patch

2009-10-31 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello, Ken Raeburn writes: > The SCM_GC_MARK_P macro doesn't exist any more, but is still mentioned > in a few places. With SCM_DEBUG defined, one of them actually gets > compiled. While looking at this, I also noticed three macros in > deprecated.h (which were there in 1.8) which use non-exis