Re: (set! (@@ MOD NAME) EXP) considered harmful

2009-09-15 Thread Neil Jerram
Andy Wingo writes: > Hi Mark, > > On Wed 02 Sep 2009 18:17, Mark H Weaver writes: > >> The ability to set! arbitrary module top-level variables from outside >> the module, using the syntax (set! (@@ MOD NAME) EXP), destroys our >> ability to several important optimizations. >> >> As long as such

Re: Some leftover bugs for this release

2009-09-15 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Mike Gran writes: > Also, the netbsd build will likely fail because there is new > 'condition is always true' condition in array-handle.c:103 > > 100 SCM > 101 scm_array_handle_element_type (scm_t_array_handle *h) > 102 { > 103    > if (h->element_type < 0 || h->element_type > SCM_ARRAY_ELEM

Re: trace examples broken in master

2009-09-15 Thread Neil Jerram
Neil Jerram writes: > Julian Graham writes: > >>> This should all be fixed in master now.  Can you have a go and let me >>> know if you still see any problems? >> >> Just built from HEAD. The errors I reported earlier are gone, but I'm >> still not getting any trace output from the `rev' exampl

GNU Guile 1.9.3 released (alpha)

2009-09-15 Thread Ludovic Courtès
We are pleased to announce GNU Guile release 1.9.3. This is the next pre-release of what will eventually become the 2.0 release series. It provides many new noteworthy features, most notably the addition of a compiler and virtual machine. We encourage you to test them and provide feedback to `gu

Re: Some leftover bugs for this release

2009-09-15 Thread Mike Gran
> From: Ludovic Courtès > > Hi, > > Mike Gran writes: > > > Also, the netbsd build will likely fail because there is new > > 'condition is always true' condition in array-handle.c:103 > > > > 100 SCM > > 101 scm_array_handle_element_type (scm_t_array_handle *h) > > 102 { > > 103 > if (h->ele

Re: trace examples broken in master

2009-09-15 Thread Neil Jerram
Neil Jerram writes: > There is an unexpected "warning: stack count incorrect!", though. I'll > look into that. It is fixed (i.e. doesn't occur) with the following changes. diff --git a/libguile/stacks.c b/libguile/stacks.c index 45566ca..849a9c7 100644 --- a/libguile/stacks.c +++ b/libguile/st

Re: BDW-GC branch updated

2009-09-15 Thread Andreas Rottmann
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Hi Neil, > > Neil Jerram writes: > >> I just installed libgc1c2 and libgc-dev (both 1:7.1-3) on my Debian >> stable/testing machine. Apparently no problem there. >> >> But there's still no pkgconfig for libgc, and so >> >> PKG_CHECK_MODULES([BDW_GC], [bd